Understanding the Hierarchy of Controls
At the heart of occupational safety and health lies a powerful conceptual framework known as the Hierarchy of Controls. This systematic approach to risk management isn’t just a theoretical model – it’s a practical roadmap that guides organisations in creating safer, healthier workplaces through increasingly effective levels of hazard mitigation.
The Theoretical Foundation: A Top-Down Approach to Safety
The Hierarchy of Controls operates on a fundamental principle: the most effective ways to protect workers involve removing hazards entirely, while the least effective rely on worker behaviour. This graduated system of control measures creates a structured approach to risk management that can be applied across any industry or workplace setting.
The hierarchy comprises five distinct levels, each representing a different approach to hazard control, arranged in descending order of effectiveness:
The Five Levels of Control

Elimination: The Gold Standard
At the apex of our hierarchy sits elimination—the complete removal of hazards from the workplace. While this approach requires the most initial effort and often the highest upfront investment, it provides the most reliable and sustainable solution to workplace safety challenges. When we eliminate a hazard, we remove not just the immediate risk, but also the ongoing costs and complications of managing that risk.
Consider the example of a noisy piece of equipment that poses hearing risks. While providing hearing protection might seem like an obvious solution, replacing the equipment with a quieter model eliminates the hazard entirely, removing the need for any additional controls.
Substitution: The Strategic Alternative
When elimination isn’t feasible, substitution offers the next best approach. This level involves replacing hazardous materials, processes, or equipment with less dangerous alternatives. The beauty of substitution lies in its ability to maintain productivity while significantly reducing risk.
For instance, switching from solvent-based paints to water-based alternatives in manufacturing processes maintains the desired outcome while reducing exposure to harmful chemicals. This approach demonstrates how safety improvements can often lead to broader operational benefits.
Engineering Controls: The Physical Barrier
Engineering controls represent our third tier of defence, involving physical changes to the workplace that isolate people from hazards. These controls are particularly valuable because they provide protection without relying on worker behaviour, creating a consistent barrier between hazards and employees.
Examples include installation of local exhaust ventilation systems, machine guarding, or noise enclosures. While these solutions require initial investment and maintenance, they provide reliable, long-term protection that operates independently of human factors.
Administrative Controls: The Procedural Approach
Moving down our hierarchy, we encounter administrative controls—procedures, training, and work scheduling that reduce exposure to hazards. While less reliable than higher-tier controls, these measures play a crucial role in comprehensive safety management, especially when used to supplement more effective controls.
This level includes safety procedures, permit to work systems, worker rotation schedules, and training programs. While these controls require consistent reinforcement and monitoring, they provide essential support to other control measures and help create a robust safety culture.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): The Last Line of Defence
At the foundation of our hierarchy lies personal protective equipment—the final barrier between workers and hazards. While PPE is often the most visible aspect of workplace safety, it’s actually our least effective control measure, relying heavily on proper selection, fit, use, and maintenance by workers.
However, PPE remains an essential component of comprehensive safety programs, particularly when higher-level controls aren’t feasible or don’t provide complete protection. Its role as a supplementary measure shouldn’t be underestimated, even as we strive for more effective controls.
The Integration of Controls
The true power of the Hierarchy of Controls emerges when we understand that these levels aren’t mutually exclusive. Most effective safety programs utilise multiple levels of control working in concert. This integrated approach creates layers of protection that compensate for the limitations of individual control measures.
Looking Forward: The Evolution of Control Measures
As technology advances and our understanding of workplace hazards grows, new opportunities for higher-level controls continue to emerge. What might have once required PPE might now be addressed through engineering controls or elimination, thanks to technological innovation and improved work processes.
Conclusion: A Framework for Action
The Hierarchy of Controls provides more than just a theoretical model—it offers a practical framework for decision-making in workplace safety. By understanding and applying this hierarchy, organizations can make informed choices about risk management strategies, always striving for the highest level of control practical in their specific context.
The journey toward safer workplaces is ongoing, but the Hierarchy of Controls gives us a clear direction: always push upward in the hierarchy when possible, while maintaining multiple layers of protection. Through this systematic approach, we can create work environments that protect workers more effectively and sustainably.